Bubbles Part II

As we discovered last week, you can be ebullient and exuberant in your effervescence. And exuberance is defined as effusive enthusiasm, what does effusive mean? And if being effervescent is another way of saying you’re bubbly and vivacious, what does vivacious mean?

Effusive is perhaps the most negative of the words in this bubbly exposition. It means unduly demonstrative, in a way that shows a lack of reserve. It is still a boiling over, but beyond the bounds of normalcy. It came to English in the 1660s (the decade after effervescence) as the adjective form of the noun effusion, which is the first form of the word to come to English, in about 1400. Effusion means pouring out (literally) or outpouring (figuratively).  The Middle French also had the word effusion, and got it from the Latin word effusionem, which means pouring forth, or spreading abroad. Effusion was not used of speech or emotion until the 1650s, after which the quick, decade later development of an adjective form was useful. It has developed a negative connotation of being unduly demonstrative, as we have perhaps become more restrained in our language usage.

Vivacious is somewhat less descriptive of language than of personality or action. It means lively and 

animated, and came to English a decade before effusion (in the 1640s). It came directly from Latin (no detour through France as have the other words in these two successive blog posts on bubbles.) The Latin word is vivax, the genitive of which is vivacis. Once again, the noun form (vivacity) preceded the adjective form in coming to English. Vivacity entered the language in the early 15^th century, from the Latin nominative form of vivacis, vivacitas. What did these words vivax, vivacis, and vivacitas refer to? A vital force, a liveliness. These Latin words were formed from the word vivere,, which means “to live”. We get the word vital from the same root word.

By the way, bubbles are defined almost spherical bodies of gas wrapped in a liquid. I know bubbles can be of something besides gas, but most bubbles are gas, so the aforementioned definition of effervescence should not include “bubbles of gas”; “bubbles of…” should only be used when the bubbles are of something other than gas. The word bubble came to English in the early 14^th century as a noun, and wasn’t used as a verb for over 100 years. It may have come from the Middle Dutch noun bobble or the Middle Low German verb bubbeln or both. Since it was originally used in English as a noun I vote for the Middle Dutch (something I’ve never done before.) And for those who enjoy them, the words bubble and bath were not recorded in tandem (as in "bubble bath" in case you're not tracking) until the year of my older brother’s birth – 1949.

So quit reading and enjoy the effervescence of a bubble bath. It will help you be ebullient today, maybe even exuberant if not vivacous. Just don’t be effusive. 

Bubbles Part I

One need not be a Shakespeare scholar to be familiar with the scene of three witches gathered around a cauldron that contains a boiling liquid. In fact, many who have never seen scene (I enjoyed putting those two words in succession) one of the fourth act of Macbeth will visualize readily that image.

But that is not the image we bring up when we hear the words ebullient, effervescent or exuberant. All three have a generally positive connotation, while the witch scene, with its “Double, double toil and trouble; fire burn, and cauldron bubble” has a distinctly negative tone.

Yet they are all related by bubbles, a very playful and childlike word.

Effervescence is the most recent word to come to English, the only one to have arrived after Shakespeare left this mortal coil (that phrase is from Hamlet, not Macbeth). It came to English in the 1650s (Shakespeare died in 1616) from the French word of the same spelling, which came to France from the Latin word effervescentem, the present participle form of effervescere, which means to boil up or boil over. Its root word is fervere, which is the word from which we get (wait for it…) fervor. Given its original sense of boiling over, it is no surprise that the verb’s definition has come to be something that giving off bubbles of gas (like fermenting liquors) or a display of enthusiasm, excitement or liveliness that is vivacious and ebullient.

Ebullient came to English as an adjective around the same time Shakespeare was writing the Henry VI trilogy, in the 1590s. It came from the Latin word ebullientem, which is the present participle of ebullire, which means to boil over, just like effervescere (I don’t know why there are two words for boil over in Latin – any Latin scholars want to explain?) But the root word for ebullientem is bullire, which means “to bubble.” It came to have the meaning of enthusiastic by the 1660s, and now the adjective means “overflowing with fervor, enthusiasm, or excitement; high-spirited.” It also continues to mean “bubbling up like a boiling liquid.”

The oldest English word is exuberant, and it is the only word not to use bubbles in its definition. The adjective came to English in the mid-15^th century, from the Middle French word exuberant. The French got their word from the Latin word exuberantum, which means “overabundance.” Exuberantum is the present participle of exuberare, which is formed by adding the prefix ex- (meaning “thoroughly”) to uberare, which means to be fruitful. Uberare is related to uber, the Latin word for udder. Perhaps we should think of boiling milk when we use the word exuberant.  It is defined as “effusively and almost uninhibitedly enthusiastic, … abounding in vitality, extremely joyful and vigorous.” It also means (probably in biology class – I didn’t pay attention) profuse in growth or production.

More bubbly words to come next week – stay tuned for Bubbles, Part II. (Love those Latin Numerals.)

I avow not to vouch for anything I aver

Let’s see – a four letter word for state positively. Begins with av… it is aver or avow? Every time I get the clue, I have to wait until I have a cross word to find out which is the answer. What’s the difference? 

Aver is “to assert or affirm with confidence; declare in a positive or peremptory manner”. Now I can aver what aver is.

What’s avow? “To declare frankly or openly; own; acknowledge; confess; admit.

So President Clinton could at the same time avow that he had an improper physical relationship with Monica Lewinsky but aver that he never had sexual relations with her. To be honest, I would have expected the opposite definitions, so I will likely remain confused.

Why two words so similar in spelling and meaning?

Aver came to English from the Old French word averer in the 14^th century. The French got averer from Vulgar Latin (for explanation, see blog of )word adverare, which means “to prove to be true.” It is formed by combining the prefix ad- (menaning “to”) with verus (meaning “true”). 

Verus is also the root for the English word verity, which we adopted into English through the Anglo-French and Old French (verite) from Latin just before we latched on to its cousin aver. (The Modern French word vérité, replete with accents acute, means the same as our word verity: truth.)

Aver came to English from the Old French word averer in the 14^th century. The French got averer from Vulgar Latin (For an explanation of Vulgar Latin, see blog of November 3, 2010 - it's not what it sounds like.) word adverare, which means “to prove to be true.” It is formed by combining the prefix ad- (menaning “to”) with verus (meaning “true”).

Verus is also the root for the English word verity, which we adopted into English from Latin after passing it through the Anglo-French and Old French word verite. 

Avow came to English even earlier (in the 13^th century) from the Anglo-French word avouer. Those crazy Anglo-French took it from the Old French word avoer, which meant to acknowledge, recognize or accept, especially as a protector. The Old French took the word from the Latin word advocare (yes, we get the word advocate from the same word). According to etymonline.com (the avowed primary source of this blog’s etymological information) avow is a synonym to avouch, but avouch “tends to contain the more technical, legal aspect of the word”.

Now, avouch’s reference on etymonline.com (it’s arrival was in the early 13^th century from the Middle French avochier, which meant to call upon authority and came ultimately from the previously mentioned advercare)  has a quote from Fowler which says several interesting things:

Avouch, which is no longer in common use, means guarantee, solemnly aver, prove by assertion, maintain the truth or existence of, vouch for….Avow means own publicly to, make no secret of, ….Vouch is now common only in the phrase vouch for, which has taken the place of avouch in ordinary use.

How sad that we have relegated vouch  to use only paired with “for”. We should vouch more often, if we’re not going to avouch. But then we don’t aver much either, and Fowler states that avouch is a solemn averring. So be lighthearted in the use of aver, but be solemn about avowing (or avouching, or vouching.)

Gotta Write

In the 1952 movie “Singin in the Rain” Gene Kelly has a dance number called “Gotta Dance” that was an apt description of his career. I’ve heard it said that successful writers are those who must write (who cannot NOT write, if you want the emphasis of the double negative). But there is writing and there is writing.

Ernest Hemingway wrote “There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at the typewriter and bleed.”

Maya Angelou wrote “There is no greater agony than bearing an untold story inside you.”

Anais Nin wrote “We write to taste life twice, in the moment and in retrospect.”

Larry Hostetler wrote the following (now I can say that once in my life my name was in the same list as Hemingway, Angelou, and Nin) because he suffers from graphomania and sometimes is dithyrambic as he tries to limn.

Graphomania, as the suffix –mania indicates, refers to a compulsion, and the grapho- prefix (it’s usually a suffix, too, like in photograph or phonograph) refers to writing. The first time the two were put together was in 1827, in the word graphomaniac, referring to the person with a passion or morbid desire to write. It was adjusted to graphomania in 1840. It came to English through French or German from Greek, where the words graphia means “description of” and graphien means “write or express in written characters.”

Dithyrambic is the adjective of dithyramb, which means the dictionary’s primary definition is “pertaining to the nature of a dithyramb”. Don’t you love it when a dictionary is so limning? A dithyramb is described as a choral hymn that is “passionate”, “of vehement or wild character”, or “exalted or enthusiastic”.  In other words, Norah Jones would never be called dithyrambic. It was eventually applied to writing other than just hymns.   It came to English in the 1600s from the Greek word dithyrambos, but where that came from is unknown. It was originally associated with hymns to Dionysus, the god of wine and ecstasy. No wonder its origin is unknown. It was probably coined by a drunk person in ecstasy trying to say another word.

Limn is the first of today’s words I came across.  It was originally used (in the 1500s) to describe the illustrations (illuminations they are called) in manuscripts. In Middle English the word used was luminen, the obvious true source of Eminem’s name (don’t believe all you read in the tabloids or on Wikipedia). The Middle English got it from the Old French word luminer which came from the Latin luminare, which meant to illuminate. From the artistic illuminations it is not a stretch to apply limn to written words that are damn illuminating.   (Mark Twain wrote “Substitute ‘damn’ every time you’re inclined to write ‘very;’ your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be.”

My Magic Dad

My father was a magician. I don't mean that metaphorically. He actually had an interest in legerdemain that grew to the extent that he performed at children's parties as a sideline. He often used the words hocus pocus as magic words, but was careful to let everyone know that he was performing tricks, not magic. What's the difference? In his mind tricks are something that make you think one way only to have a different result. My favorite trick was the one where black and white wood bunnies changed places from one box to another. You'd think you figured out how he did the trick only for him to reveal the bunnies at the end of the trick as red and yellow. How he did it was always a secret, but it was also always entertaining. 

Magic (the word, not the activity) is defined as the art (I don't know that my dad considered himself an artist, though) of producing illusions. The word came to English in the 14th century from the French word magique, which came from the Latin word magicus, which they got from the Greek word magikos. (The adjectival and noun forms have a slightly different etymology, but these three words are common to both.) Magikos comes from magos, which was descriptive of someone who was a Priest or highly educated. My dictionary uses the word legerdemain as a synonym. 

Legerdemain, however, has a slightly different connotation. The word came to English in the early 15^th century from the Middle French phrase léger de main, which meant “quick of hand” (literally “light of hand”). Modern magical acts often have both the sleight of hand, the small tricks that legerdemain refer to – often card tricks – as well as large production tricks that have no sleight of hand, merely misdirection and mechanical secrets.

Prestidigitation is probably a word adopted by magicians. It is adopted directly from the French word with the same spelling, which was created by combining the French word for nimble, preste, with the Latin word for finger digitus. It came to English in 1843, and is related to the French word for juggler, prestigiateur. 

In my opinion prestigiditation would refer more to a juggling trick than sleight of hand. If many card tricks are legerdemain, perhaps the even more nimble coin tricks are examples of prestidigitation. In most usage they’re interchangeable.

So where does hocus pocus come in? Its origin isn’t certain, but according to some (etymonline attributes it initially to an English prelate named John Tillotson) it may be a  perversion of the phrase Hoc est corpus meum (This is my body) used in the Latin Mass during the sacrament of Eucharist.

I also like etymonline.com’s citation of another early usage:

I will speak of one man…that went about in King James his time…who called himself, the Kings Majesties most excellent Hocus Pocus, and so was called, because that at the playing of every Trick, he used to say Hocus Pocus, tontus tabantus, vade celeriter jubeo, a dark composure of words to blinde the eyes of the beholders, to make his Trick pass the more currently without discovery. [Thomas Ady, “A Candle in the Dark,” 1655]

One can easily imagine the art of magic, including legerdemain and prestidigitation (and even juggling) being entertainment in castles and city squares throughout France and England. Or at a Renaissance Faire today.